Books And Shnooks*


I lent my twentysomething friend Dejan a book about a year ago — The Naked Civil Servant, by Quentin Crisp.  It was a mistake, I knew at the time, not only because it was not his speed (he's into these dreadful vampire books), but because the book, dog-eared and scrawled on, had, oddly enough, deep sentimental value to me:  it was a gift (and clearly inscribed to me on the inside cover) I was given on a long-ago trip to New Zealand, and the scrawling in the margins and on the last several blank pages and back inside cover were essentially my on-the-fly travelogue.

_______________________________________________________

I have ended friendships because a book
came back to me with a creased spine.
_______________________________________________________


Maybe there's a generational — and there's certainly a digital — divide at work here.  It may be a sign of how devalued books have become in the age of kindles and iphones.  I mean, I came of age in a time when if someone lent you a book, I don't care how dog-eared or dog-eaten it was when it came into your hands, it was a testament to friendship, a sign of sacred esteem, and you treated it as a treasure. 

Or you could look at it as a test.  I have ended friendships because a book came back to me with a creased spine. There was no big scene, but when I saw it, I silently resolved I would go no further with such a person.  And I have never regretted such a decision.  It's just one of those things.  You lend someone a book, it's both an IQ and an EQ test. 

It's so rare for me to lend my books nowadays — I have been in Boston full-time for five or six years, not nearly long enough to have friends I'd entrust with a book — that when Dejan said on two occasions "the book you said you lent me" it was a stinging reminder of my misjudgment.

I finally had to say "I said I lent it to you... because I lent it to you."  It was like an admission of guilt.  And stupidity. 

I've made peace with the loss of the book.  It was my own carelessness with it, after all, that resulted in its loss.  I mean, it'd be like asking Jake to water my plants while I was away.  I should fully expect to come home to not only find them all dead, but for Jake to be like "what plants?" when asked about them. 

We all know he'd be all: "Oh, those?  Dude, are you sure those weren't dead already?  Are you sure you asked me to water them?  Why would I water a bunch of dead plants?" And so on. 

I'm a lot more laid back than I used to be about this sort of thing, as hard as it is to believe.  I'd like to think that I would be less annoyed if Dejan had not repeated that annoying phrase "you said you lent me", but he did, and I'm not.**
____________________________________
*12/27/2010 3:30 p.m.:  Dejan has just texted to tell me he's found the book I said I lent him.  So now I feel like the shnook.  Still, the next time I get the urge to lend him one, I'll remember Anita's sage advice, and just send the kindle version to his iphone instead.

**12/27/2010 3:45 p.m.: I took out the part about not entrusting him with anything precious.  That might have been a little harsh.  I still wouldn't recommend it, but I didn't have to say it like that.  Hopefully he hasn't read this yet.
 
Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 2/27/2010 2:49 AM Anita wrote:

    You've reminded me of one of my favorite scenes in "Out of Africa." Karen asks Berkeley Cole if Denys ever lent his books and he replies that once, when Denys was angry that someone failed to return a book, he asked Denys, "You wouldn't lose a friend over a book, would you?" and Denys replied, "No, but he would."

    I have books that I would give away. Some of them, I bought two of so that I could do just that. I never lend books and learned long ago not to lend anything I wasn't willing to give away.

    Your posts, over the last few months especially. have been particularly enjoyable.


    Reply to this
    1. 2/27/2010 8:33 AM Mike Mennonno wrote:

      Ah, wise words, Anita.

      I have books I'd give away, too.  I actually have no idea what came over me this time.


      Reply to this
  • 2/27/2010 1:02 PM Patrick wrote:

    We usually step out of character and do things we normally wouldn't when faced with some kind of subconscious desire to "be the change we wish to see in the world". As in, maybe there is no one in Boston to which you would lend a book only because of your lack of lending.

    You lent the book out hoping for the potential outcome; that there would exist someone in your own life that could sense the emotional importance of that object, of any object, and somehow that their time with the book would add to it's story.

    How nice would it have been to get that book back with his own little markings and evidence left on it, there's a nice romantic camaraderie there. It's a shame that didn't work out. More than that he didn't realize he was the ambassador for any and all book lending there would ever be and just ruined it for the whole rest of us.

    I mean, if I borrowed a book, you'd just get it back with a few of the pages stuck together.


    Reply to this
    1. 2/27/2010 4:24 PM Mike Mennonno wrote:

      Have I told you lately that I love you, Patrick?


      Reply to this
      1. 2/28/2010 10:20 PM Patrick wrote:

        Not nearly enough.


        Reply to this
  • 2/27/2010 6:37 PM Toby wrote:

    Lending a book is not like lending a wheelbarrow. When you lend someone a book you are letting them in on a secret part of you. You are telling them about yourself, what you value, what you fear, what you admire, and so if they do not recognize that by being careless with the book, we feel rejected. Been there, done that. I keep my books all arranged on shelves across from my sofa where other people have their giant flat screen TV and spend hours just looking at them (when not reading).

    Bottom line, look but don't touch.


    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.