Teasin' Ain't Pleasin'

No biggie.
Gail Collins has a hilarious op-ed about Levi Johnston in today's Times.
Poor Levi. He's gotten back in the news by publicly apologizing to the Palins for saying things about them that "were not completely true". Well, what does that have to do with anything? I mean, are we talking about the same Palins here? The Death-Panel Palins?
Whatevs. I'll tell you this much: Levi would not be groveling his way back into the limelight if he'd showed us his junk in that Playgirl photo shoot. But we all know why he didn't, don't we?

Maybe instead of stretching the truth, Levi should
have gotten busy stretching something else.
I mean, you can trace his plummet back to Alaskan obscurity directly to his Playgirl shoot. There's some speculation Levi didn't go the full monty out of consideration for taste. We're talking someone who had to be strapped down and sedated so they could lop off his mullet before they'd allow him out in public on the campaign trail. All the sudden he's a paragon of good taste?
Who goes to Playgirl for the tasteful spreads anyway? It'd be like watching Jersey Shore for fashion tips or going to The Bachelor for relationship advice. Palin and her crew belong to the same strain of pop culture. It's all about looking stupid and talking shit. But if you're that dumb, you better be hung.
Because you don't get points for being coy.
The long and (more likely) very short of it is: Levi's cute, but he's not cute enough to not show his dick in a Playgirl photo spread and still be cute.
Sorry Leevs. All this teasin' just ain't that pleasin'.
Of course, you could always produce a sex-tape that proves the world wrong. You're probably gonna want to get stretchin' first, though.


























Gay man though I may be, somehow I just didn't hop aboard the Levi train. It's not that he's not my type (I have a good 17 or 19 types) but that I have never at any time gotten the slightest hint of erotic heat from him. And without that, the length of the goods is irrelevant, at least for me.
Reply to this
I don't disagree, Will. I don't think he's sexy in the least. I also have lots of different physical types I can go for as long as they have that all important je ne sais quoi. (If Levi was furry, though, he'd have shot from about a 3 to a 7 on my one-to-ten scale, gotta say.)
But I think the hoopla surrounding the Playgirl shoot had more to do with the "rogue" element in the Palin camp. There was something completely outrageous about how the whole thing was playing out.
So when he didn't bare all, it was doubly disappointing. Not only did we not get to see a grown man naked (which even if he's not my type I'm always up for out of pure curiosity) but we witnessed one totally chickening out.
I like how they summed it up over at Gawker:
Reply to this